Backnumbers Index    << Preceding Number   Next Number >>
TOP
Quarterly News Magazine Share the View
  <<Backnumbers>>
OVAC at a Glance
History
Annual Report
Organization
Map and Access
Membership and Donation
Links
 

TOP > Share the View > Backnumbers

OVAC Quarterly News Magazine Vol.1 January, 2001
"Share the view" is quarterly publication providing current information and topics on NGO/NPO sectors in Japan and opinions of Mr. Noboru Hayase, our Executive Director and editorial writers out of our monthly opinion magazine "Volo". Taking into consideration of the wide-ranged non-governmental activities in Japan, it also includes information on volunteering, activities & movements of non-profit & community-based groups.


Punished for not doing community service activities?

An idea described as "pub talk about education" (Manabu Sato, a professor of Tokyo Univ. graduate school) is supported by the Japanese ruling party, and now the party tries to legislate for this idea. This idea is "mandatory community service "proposed by an education advisory panel to the Prime Minister, "The National Commission on Educational Reform".

The panel proposed that elementary and junior high school students spend two weeks performing community service, while high school students spend one month. They are required to live together at public facilities during the period. The panel states "this law will be applied to every citizen at equivalent ages including youths who have already left school to work", and "(students) will be required to perform some kind of humanitarian work such as farmwork, forestry, nursing care for the elderly, etc. The panel "plans to expand the service period to a whole year as soon as possible". If students refuse to perform community service, "they will lose qualifications to receive higher education or to be employed by companies"said an executive member of the ruling party.

We strongly oppose this proposal and urge our government and the ruling party to reconsider their support for this idea.

Why does this reform attach importance to "mandatory community service" instead of "learning through community service experience"? Actual experience gives one
an opportunity to realize one's social responsibilities. Many people now understand the effectiveness of experienced-based learning, and those people have positively accepted an approach called "learning through voluntary service experience" in many cities in Japan.

Spontaneity and experience gained through thinking and acting for oneself. These are the two most important elements of, and in fact these are real joys of, experience-based learning. That is why school staff who supports the "learning through experience" approach have been making an effort to create environments where participants can spontaneously perform voluntary service. As in the fairy tale, this idea is based on the approach of "sunh rather than gnorth wind".

If participation is forced and students are under threat of punishment, such a spontaneous learning attitude can never arise. Indeed, if students are forced to perform a service, they may adopt a passive attitude and only do things that they are told to do.

Volunteer groups hold a symposium to discuss mandatory social services for all youth. ( article of The Asahi dated October 25, 2000 )
I am also concerned that forcing students to perform mandatory service will devalue the service, and the idea of social service. Understanding toward others can be nurtured through every social activity , but not just through "humanitarian work" proposed in the panel's interim report. However, we can not expect students to develop such an ability if authority obliges the performance of community service. For me, mandatory community service seems to force students to accept a narrow definition of "good". "What is good" here is defined by the government, and it seems to be based on the concept of "service to our country".
I should also point out the problem of using social welfare service facilities as "teaching materials". We have repeatedly criticized this problem in our monthly magazines, and we think mandatory community service will add further troubles to these social welfare facilities. The panel's proposal lacks respect for the human rights of people now receiving care. Social welfare facilities will be used as teaching materials (places) for students who are supposed to learn understanding toward others. In 1998, the Japanese government started to oblige all candidates for teacher's employment examinations to have nursing care experience. In the May issue of our monthly magazine (1998), we presented a detailed report on this topic as a feature story. If the participation were a spontaneous one, participants could naturally develop a positive attitudes towards people's diverse personalities. On the other hand, if participants were forced to participate, their attitudes would be passive, and would not show any enthusiasm or subtlety to compensate their lack of skill. As a result, they would only be a burden to the staff members in each facility.

In other words, this mandatory nursing care experience is causing unethical situations in which one person is always sacrificed for someone else to learn patience. The panel's proposal will involve many students in these already-controversial situations.

What we need to recover now is not an education forced by authority, but the one in which students can realize the joy of learning and pleasure of discovery. In such an education, each student has the opportunity to use their ability for others. This is a feeling of, so to speak, "not MUST, but CAN". I believe an ideal education should provide each and every student with the opportunity to realize this feeling.
Noboru Hayase, Executive Director, Osaka Voluntary Action Center
In Japan, two out of three people have an intention to do volunteering,
one of which has not yet done it.
In Japan, three out of four people hope to contribute to society in some way. Two out of three people have an intention to do volunteering, one of which has not yet done it. This means that the willingness to volunteer is fairly high if include those with no prior experience.
Source:Economic Planning Agency,
"The National Survey on Lifestyle Preferences"(2000)

 

There are many differences in personal motivations for giving
and volunteering between Japan and the U.S
There are many differences in incentives and reasons to start volunteering between Japan and the U.S. First, the activities for acquaintances and a sense of obligation make people volunteer in Japan. On the other hand, attitudes toward fulfilling personal satisfaction are relatively strong in the U.S. Second, there are few people in Japan who consider "Serving as an example to others" to be a reason to volunteer.
Source:Economic Planning Agency, "The National Survey on Lifestyle Preferences"(2000)

If you would like to receive “Share the View” automatically on a regular basis, please click Sign up for “Share the View” update on our homepage of the URL http://www.osakavol.org/english/share.html . Then, please follow the guidance on the registration page. This e-mail list is used exclusively for the distribution of OVAC´s quarterly publication. Your e-mail addresses are not sold or traded to any other organization